Not Going Down Without a Fight, Part 1 of 3



By Ben Beliles, from Guam, on the outer rim of the Republic

We have to face a stark reality. The West is losing. We are a civilization that has lost the political will to successfully pursue a war of more than a few weeks duration and a few hundred casualties. Consumed in our self-absorption, we no longer have time for dealing with issues other than when we are going to get our next buzz. There is no longer any great sense of moral purpose or destiny for the American people.

What highlights the weak moral courage of the American people and their stance on the war is that the vast majority of the American people simply are unaffected by the war we are currently waging. There is no gasoline or food rationing like there was in World War II on a grand scale. There is no draft, nor any chance of one being instituted, despite the fear mongering of Charlie Rangel.

Read on . . .

The simple fact of the matter is that this is not a war being fought by all the American people in any sense of the word. This is a war being waged by the Armed Forces of the United States of America, who willingly do their duty in the belief that they are making a difference for democracy in the world, while the nation that sent them there to do the job would rather turn a blind eye and a deaf ear to what is going on overseas. Not because it affects them in the least, but simply because they don’t want to have to think about it or feel guilty because their friend is under mortar fire in Kirkuk while they are on an important wine tasting expedition, talking about our most recent national Anna Nicole Smith or Paris Hilton distraction, or engaged in trying to catch up with the Joneses who own the two beamers next door.

A withdrawal from Iraq at this juncture would throw the country into bloody upheaval and civil war on a scale that could potentially dwarf the blood bath that enveloped South Vietnam and Indochina in the months following the 1974 Democratic Congress’s decision to cut off funding to South Vietnam, following the 1973 Case-Church Amendment that forbid any military activity in South Vietnam. The North Vietnamese took this as open invitation to invade South Vietnam, which they subsequently did, capturing Saigon of course in the spring of 1975. Estimates place the number of civilians who were slaughtered in the months that followed at between 1 and 2 million people. We evacuated hundreds of thousands of South Vietnamese, while hundreds of thousands of others fled on hastily constructed rafts into the South China Sea where they either were drowned or raped and killed by opportunistic pirates. The blood of those people was shed because we foolishly decided we would provide no more aid, despite the fact that the success of the South Vietnamese military in defeating the NVA Easter Offensive of 1972 with the limited help of American military advisors and our air superiority proved that South Vietnam could sustain itself with just a little help from ourselves. Instead 58,000 American boys paid the ultimate sacrifice in Vietnam and South Vietnam still lost its freedom.

Once again, a Democratic Congress is rushing toward the creation of a humanitarian disaster. Just as withdrawal from Vietnam resulted in even greater casualties and human rights disasters than did the Vietnam War itself, withdrawal from Iraq would open the door for a similar catastrophe. Although many Americans might prefer that result to even one more American life being lost, a thought I can certainly sympathize with, it would be a human disaster of epic proportions as well as a massive defeat for our nation, both militarily and diplomatically. Ethnic cleansing as well as the potential for the encroachment of Iran into the political and civil life of the Iraqi people is almost inevitable should American troops withdraw.

That is a risk we just cannot afford to take.

Average: 3.3 (4 votes)

Overly dramatic

Oh please! Americans have never had a taste for long wars. Discontent was present even during WWII. President Eisenhower even commented on Americans not liking drawn out wars. Please consult history before writing drivel.

America's Long War

America's war with the Indians - 1608 to 1890 was a rather long war. It's an appropriate metaphor for the long, long war we are in now.

At times during our long war with the Indians - the only engagement in fighting was the folks out on the frontier and the U.S. Army. It didn't effect the Nation or engage its whole energies.

The key distinction in the metaphor between the two long wars is that the Indian Wars were a clash of civilizations to conquer and control one continent vs the World War Against Islamists is a clash of ideologies (based on a fundamental clash of civilizations) that requires the containment of Islamic Civilization - and occasional offensive operations to smash a cell or a government - until the Muslims reform themselves enough to stop breeding Islamists.

After 2050 (when I'm quite dead) the dynamic changes if Europe has failed to return to Christianity and convert the Muslims - and Europe becomes part of the Caliphate. A deeper, worse Dark Ages descends.

Dear Anonymous, Please show

Dear Anonymous,
Please show me where I went wrong on the history.
As far as long wars, we were involved in Vietnam for a decade, and even as late as 1968 (3 to 4 years into the war depending on where you want to start counting), 60% of the populace supported the war. It wasn't until the Tet Offensive in '68 that the popularity of the war really started to falter across the country.
Secondly, Iraq is a very minor war compared to many of our wars in the past. We have lost around 3500 men now. I serve as a captain in the United States Air Force on Guam, an island 30 miles long in the Western Pacific, where in 1944, we lost 2,000 to 3,000 Americans dead in two weeks of fighting (this is with a national population of 130 million compared to our current 300 million). Although I absolutely agree that every single life is important, the numbers of casualties in Iraq are paltry compared to Vietnam, Korea, Iraq. This is a sustained counterinsurgency more than a war.
Lighthorse Harry

excellent

excellent

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.